Episode Synopsis "ABA, plaintiffs push back against state claims in Illinois interchange lawsuit"
ABA and other plaintiffs said the court has already recognized that an Illinois law restricting certain interchange fees is preempted by federal law, so it should reject the state’s arguments against the court making a summary judgment in the case. The post ABA, plaintiffs push back against state claims in Illinois interchange lawsuit appeared first on ABA Banking Journal.
Listen "ABA, plaintiffs push back against state claims in Illinois interchange lawsuit"
More episodes of the podcast Legal | ABA Banking Journal
- ABA, associations urge CFPB to rescind changes to adjudication process
- OCC’s Hood affirms support for federal preemption
- CFPB asks court to vacate Section 1033 data sharing rule
- Illinois lawmakers vote to delay implementation date for state interchange fee law
- Reconsideration of value: A critical component of appraisal review
- Fed, plaintiffs seek pause in stress test lawsuit
- With Trump signing repeal of CFPB overdraft rule, ABA to drop lawsuit
- ABA, plaintiffs push back against state claims in Illinois interchange lawsuit
- Fifth Circuit dismisses appeal of UDAAP lawsuit
- CFPB asks court to vacate medical debt rule