Episode Synopsis "James Gibson - Understandings of Justice"

To what degree do judicial decisions contribute to the acceptance of unpopular political decisions? Do court decisions have a greater power to legitimize than the decisions of other political institutions? Are courts perceived as more procedurally fair than other political institutions? Do perceptions of procedural fairness-be it in a court or legislative institution-contribute to the efficacy of institutional decisions? These are the questions James Gibson seeks to answer in Understandings of Justice through the use of surveys. We discuss his findings and conclusions.

Listen "James Gibson - Understandings of Justice"

More episodes of the podcast Left, Right, and Unwonted

• James Gibson - Understandings of Justice
• Guy Debord - The Society of the Spectacle Part 4
• Guy Debord - The Society of the Spectacle Part 3
• Guy Debord - The Society of the Spectacle Part 2
• Guy Debord - The Society of the Spectacle Part 1
• Joshua Hawley - America's Epicurean Liberalism
• John Hasnas - The Myth of the Rule of Law
• The 1619 Project and the 1776 Commission Report - Episode 9: Conclusion
• The 1619 Project and the 1776 Commission Report - Episode 8: 1776
• The 1619 Project and the 1776 Commission Report - Episode 7: Democracy
• The 1619 Project and the 1776 Commission Report - Episode 6: Traffic
• The 1619 Project and the 1776 Commission Report - Episode 5: Healthcare
• The 1619 Project and the 1776 Commission Report - Episode 4: Capitalism
• The 1619 Project and the 1776 Commission Report - Episode 3: The Idea of America
• The 1619 Project and the 1776 Commission Report - Episode 2: Title Page and Introductory Paragraph
• Carole Pateman - The Fraternal Social Contract
• The 1619 Project and the 1776 Commission Report - Episode 1: Introduction
• Michael Huemer - The Problem of Political Authority Part 1
• James Scott - State Simplification
• Quentin Skinner - The State