Episode Synopsis "Episode 12: "What Everyone Should Say about Symmetries (and How Humeans Get to Say It)", Michael Townsen Hicks (deep dive featuring the author!)"
For this episode, I’m joined by Dr Michael Townsen Hicks to discuss his paper “What Everyone Should Say about Symmetries (and How Humeans Get to Say It)”, published in Philosophy of Science in 2019. Mike is a research fellow on the FramePhys project at the University of Birmingham. Link to the paper: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/705475More about Mike: https://www.townsenhicks.com/The FraMEPhys project: https://framephys.org/ If you enjoyed the show, please rate and review it on your favourite app so more people can find it. You can carry on the discussion on Twitter and there's even an Instagram page. Thanks for listening! Support the Show.
Listen "Episode 12: "What Everyone Should Say about Symmetries (and How Humeans Get to Say It)", Michael Townsen Hicks (deep dive featuring the author!)"
More episodes of the podcast Condensed Matter
- 36: "The Singularity: A Philosophical Analysis", David Chalmers
- 35: "There is no measurement problem for Humeans", Chris Dorst
- 34: "The Limits of Modality", Sam Cowling
- 33: "Biochemical Functions", Francesca Bellazzi (deep dive featuring the author!)
- 32: "Substance", Donnchadh O'Conaill (deep dive featuring the author!)
- 31: "Biological Individuality and the Foetus Problem", Will Morgan (deep dive featuring the author!)
- 30: “How Skeptical is Quine’s “Modal Skepticism”?”, John Divers
- Ep. 29: "Modal Conventionalism", Ross Cameron
- Ep. 28: "Panpsychism", Thomas Nagel (CM classic!)
- Ep. 27: “Modal dispositionalism and necessary perfect masks”, Barbara Vetter and Ralf Busse
- Ep. 26: "An Apology for Naturalized Metaphysics", James Ladyman (deep dive featuring the author!)
- Ep. 25 "The Governing Conception of Laws", Nina Emery (deep dive featuring the author!)
- Ep. 24: “Going Beyond the Fundamental: Feminism in Contemporary Metaphysics”, Elizabeth Barnes
- Ep. 23: "Governing Without a Fundamental Direction of Time", Chen and Goldstein
- Ep. 22: "Aristotelian Supervenience", John Heil
- Episode 21: "Causal Content and Global Laws: Grounding Modality in Experimental Practice", Jenann Ismael
- Episode 20: "Disagreement in Metaphysics", Timothy WIlliamson
- Episode 19: "Realism Without Parochialism", Phillip Bricker
- Episode 18: "Metaphysics After Carnap: the Ghost Who Walks?", Huw Price
- Episode 17: "Social kinds are essentially mind-dependent", Rebecca Mason
- Episode 16: "Calculus and counterpossibles in science", Brian McLoone
- Episode 15: "The rationality of metaphysics", E.J. Lowe
- Episode 14: "Where Do You Get Your Protein? Or: Biochemical Realization", Tuomas Tahko (deep dive featuring the author!)
- Episode 13: "Norms and Modality", Amie Thomasson
- Episode 12: "What Everyone Should Say about Symmetries (and How Humeans Get to Say It)", Michael Townsen Hicks (deep dive featuring the author!)
- Episode 11: “Nomothetic Explanation and Humeanism about Laws of Nature”, Harjit Bhogal
- Episode 10: "Realism and the Absence of Value", Shamik Dasgupta
- Episode 9: "Megarian Variable Actualism", Toby Friend (deep dive featuring the author!)
- Episode 8: "Sideways music", Ned Markosian
- Episode 7: "The Ground Between the Gaps", Jonathan Schaffer
- Episode 6: "Conceptualizing causal powers: activity, capacity, essence, necessitation", Ruth Groff
- Episode 5: "There Are No Ahistorical Theories of Function", Justin Garson
- Episode 4: "Troubles with Theoretical Virtues: Resisting Theoretical Utility Arguments in Metaphysics", Otávio Bueno and Scott Shalkowski
- Episode 3: "Ramseyan Humility", David Lewis
- Episode 2: "Fundamental Powers, Evolved Powers, and Mental Powers", Alexander Bird; "Evolved Powers, Artefact Powers, and Dispositional Explanations", Barbara Vetter
- Episode 1: "How scientific models can explain", Alisa Bokulich
- Episode 0: Introducing Condensed Matter