PX - Normative Models: Their Limits, Points of Contention, and Questions for Further Research (Part 2)

PX - Normative Models: Their Limits, Points of Contention, and Questions for Further Research (Part 2)

Philosophy Exchange Podcast

12/10/2022 9:00AM

Episode Synopsis "PX - Normative Models: Their Limits, Points of Contention, and Questions for Further Research (Part 2)"

In this episode, Ina is joined again by Joe Roussos, a postdoctoral researcher at the Institute for Futures Studies in Stockholm, Marcel Jahn, a PhD candidate at the Department of Philosophy at the Humboldt University in Berlin, and Lukas Beck, a postdoctoral researcher in the Scientific Assessments, Ethics and Public Policy working group and a member of the Rivet Project at the Mercator Research Institute on Global Commons and Climate Change in Berlin. Together, they continue their discussion on models in science and philosophy that aim to provide normative guidance to agents, so-called normative models. Today’s episode focuses on the limits of normative models, points of contention between the authors and questions for further research.

Listen "PX - Normative Models: Their Limits, Points of Contention, and Questions for Further Research (Part 2)"

More episodes of the podcast Philosophy Exchange Podcast