Episode Synopsis "AI decision making doesn’t need to be explainable, but it should be responsive"

Public policies are increasingly being underpinned by automatic algorithmic decision making processes that have in some instances spectacularly failed.  Daan Kolkmanand Gijs van Maanen argue that efforts to make these algorithmic decisions accountable by making them transparent and explainable are ultimately limited, if these mechanisms remain unresponsive to the contextual knowledge and expertise that exists in … Continued

Listen "AI decision making doesn’t need to be explainable, but it should be responsive"

More episodes of the podcast Impact of Social Sciences

• The perfect host – Why archiving research communication outputs is key to long term impact
• It’s time to extend the FAIR Principles of data sharing
• Are misinformation interventions different or fundamentally the same?
• The US presidential election shows the limits of the ‘science’ of polling
• What happens when you let ChatGPT assess impact case studies?
• Do Community Notes work?
• How we make history together – Exhibiting the local aftermath of Grenfell
• AI decision making doesn’t need to be explainable, but it should be responsive
• 2024 in review – The top posts of 2024
• 2024 In review – The art and science of research impact