<a href="https://seatacnoise.info/ep-8-the-rube-goldberg-debt-experiment">Last week</a> we took the easy way out and provided a podcast version of our popular Part 150 for Dummies article. This week, even lazier, answering reader questions, in order to give the crew a chance to catch up, which is no small taskStill, most of the questions we get are the same. Over and over. Each of these questions are 'teasers' for future episodes already on the schedule.<h2>SAMP Webinar</h2>There is still time to sign up for the <a href="https://seatacnoise.info/bookmark/port-of-seattle-samp-ea-webinar/">Port of Seattle's SAMP webinar on Wednesday October 8, 6:00pm</a>.<h2>Des Moines City Council "Negative-Impact Airport Usage Fee"</h2>We respond to a proposal by a Des Moines City Councilmember to create a statewide "negative-impact airport usage fee." This is unbelievably illegal.<h2>How Can SAMP Provide More Operations Than the Third Runway?</h2>We always get questions wondering how the SAMP can provide more operations than the Third Runway. Before the Third Runway, there were over  400,000 operations a year on <em>two</em> runways. People forget that.<h2>Air Traffic Control Is Going to Hell</h2>We always get questions when there is any glitch in airport travel. People have it backwards.  We keep trying to tell people that airports are a factory. Remember that TV episode with Lucy and Ethel and the chocolate assembly line? God help all airport communities if they ever get the funding they ask for every year.<h2>Tree Cutting</h2>We got several letters about a letter we wrote to the Burien City Council. It didn't seem supportive enough about tree cutting under the Flight Corridor Safety Program at Mathison Park. Please listen ton <a href="https://seatacnoise.info/ep-7-everybody-loves-trees/">Ep #7: Everybody Loves Trees</a>, the FCSP has been a matter of public record since 2016.<h2>Laws vs. Regs</h2>We get regular questions about 'airport laws'. For the nerds out there, we describe the difference between airport law (USC) and FAA regulations (CFR).<h2>Noise Density Guidelines</h2>Last week we left out an important detail about one of those regulations -- Part 150. That was because it has no practical value at the moment. It is from the distant past: property buyouts and noise lands; the other 'rings' inside the DNL65.<h2>North Sea-Tac Park</h2>On a related note, we describe an ongoing effort we've been engaged in that ties together all our work: North Sea-Tac Park. This time it's about a law, specifically USC Title 49. An example of how long term mitigation should work. Not the 30-day notice.<h2>Impact Study</h2>We get questions on our <a href="https://seatacnoise.info/legislation-2026/">STNI 2026 Legislative Agenda</a>, specifically  why we keep advocating for another 'impact study' like the <a href="/hok">HOK 1997</a>.We also describe another long term project we've been working on -- gathering all that data concerning those 'inner rings' of the Noise Density Guidelines."The truth is out there."To learn the rest of the story on each of these programs: <a href="http://stni.info/subscribe">stni.info/subscribe</a>

Ver todos los episodios