Welcome to Revise and Resubmit, where we dive deep into groundbreaking research that shapes the way we understand business, marketing, and technology. Today, we’re looking at an eye-opening study featured in the Harvard Business Review. Imagine this: researchers analyzed nearly 2 million purchases and found that influencers with fewer than 10,000 followers—yes, those so-called “nano-influencers”—delivered far better returns on marketing investments than their mega-famous counterparts.
Why? It’s all about the personal connection. Nano-influencers have a deeper bond with their audience, and that authenticity drives real engagement, translating directly to sales. This study encourages marketers to rethink their strategies, highlighting how smaller followership could be the secret weapon for generating revenue in a cost-effective way.
But here’s the big question: If the future of influencer marketing lies in smaller, tighter-knit audiences, are we missing out by only chasing the big names? Stay tuned as we unpack this game-changing research!

Reference
Beichert, M., Bayerl, A., Goldenberg, J., & Lanz, A. (2024). Revenue generation through influencer marketing. Journal of Marketing, 88(4).
DOI https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429231217471.
When It Comes to Influencers, Smaller Can Be Better. (2024, September). Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2024/09/when-it-comes-to-influencers-smaller-can-be-better

Ver todos los episodios