Episode Synopsis "What do researchers acknowledge ChatGPT for in their papers?"

Publishers increasingly require and academics are increasingly willing to acknowledge and credit the role played by AI in their research papers. Discussing a recent study, of these acknowledgements Kayvan Kousha … Continued The post What do researchers acknowledge ChatGPT for in their papers? first appeared on Impact of Social Sciences.

Listen "What do researchers acknowledge ChatGPT for in their papers?"

More episodes of the podcast Impact of Social Sciences

• ChatGPT doesn’t think like a human, so why does it speak like one?
• Distributed Peer Review – How the wisdom of the crowd can allocate grant funding
• Lack of geographic diversity in peer review skews “publishable” research
• “Dancing in the Rain” – How to better recognise the impact of longitudinal studies and research infrastructure
• The universalist approach to research ethics poses challenges and opportunities for doctoral research outside the Global North
• Shaking up the scholarly publishing market – Why caps on APCs could backfire
• What do researchers acknowledge ChatGPT for in their papers?
• The unethical burden of public engagement and the “alt-output” problem
• Public views on the “convenience” of AI tools are not the same as AI developers and policymakers
• Can we measure trust in scientific publications?