Episode Synopsis "Shaking up the scholarly publishing market – Why caps on APCs could backfire"

Presenting their analysis of the current state of APC pricing and the potential impact of proposed NIH caps on APCs, Stefanie Haustein, Eric Schares, Juan Pablo Alperin, Flavia Camargo, Lisa … Continued The post Shaking up the scholarly publishing market – Why caps on APCs could backfire first appeared on Impact of Social Sciences.

Listen "Shaking up the scholarly publishing market – Why caps on APCs could backfire"

More episodes of the podcast Impact of Social Sciences

• ChatGPT doesn’t think like a human, so why does it speak like one?
• Distributed Peer Review – How the wisdom of the crowd can allocate grant funding
• Lack of geographic diversity in peer review skews “publishable” research
• “Dancing in the Rain” – How to better recognise the impact of longitudinal studies and research infrastructure
• The universalist approach to research ethics poses challenges and opportunities for doctoral research outside the Global North
• Shaking up the scholarly publishing market – Why caps on APCs could backfire
• What do researchers acknowledge ChatGPT for in their papers?
• The unethical burden of public engagement and the “alt-output” problem
• Public views on the “convenience” of AI tools are not the same as AI developers and policymakers
• Can we measure trust in scientific publications?