Distributed Peer Review – How the wisdom of the crowd can allocate grant funding

Impact of Social Sciences
18/09/2025
Distributed Peer Review – How the wisdom of the crowd can allocate grant funding

Listen "Distributed Peer Review – How the wisdom of the crowd can allocate grant funding"

Descargar episodio Ver en sitio original

Episode Synopsis

Research funders face challenges in finding peer reviewers for grant applications and in ensuring review takes place in a fair and timely manner. Melanie Benson Marshall, Anna Butters, Stephen Pinfield … Continued
The post Distributed Peer Review – How the wisdom of the crowd can allocate grant funding first appeared on Impact of Social Sciences.

More episodes of the podcast Impact of Social Sciences

ChatGPT doesn’t think like a human, so why does it speak like one? 19/09/2025
Lack of geographic diversity in peer review skews “publishable” research 17/09/2025
“Dancing in the Rain” – How to better recognise the impact of longitudinal studies and research infrastructure 16/09/2025
The universalist approach to research ethics poses challenges and opportunities for doctoral research outside the Global North 12/09/2025
Shaking up the scholarly publishing market – Why caps on APCs could backfire 11/09/2025
What do researchers acknowledge ChatGPT for in their papers? 10/09/2025
The unethical burden of public engagement and the “alt-output” problem 08/09/2025
Public views on the “convenience” of AI tools are not the same as AI developers and policymakers 04/09/2025
Can we measure trust in scientific publications? 03/09/2025
© 2003-2025 ZARZA | AHEAD OF OUR TIME
privacy policy
In God we trust In God we trust
PreSales Questions? Click Here
or call our toll-free line at +1-888-5002068 Miami, Florida, USA