Bradley and Karen
discuss two debates going on in the free and open source software
community. One recent and seemingly inflated, and one long and
confusing.


Show Notes:

Segment 1 (03:12)


Bradley wrote a blog
post about the Bionic issues that were raised. (03:44)

On the old oggcast, Karen
and Bradley discussed the Android/Linux system and Bionic
specifically. (04:09)

Karen mentioned an old oggcast
where permissive vs. copyleft licensing was discussed. (06:19)

Jake Edge wrote an LWN
article that discussed Bionic (07:58)

Bradley mentioned Raymond
Nimmer's blog that started the debate (10:52)

Bradley also mentioned Edward
Naughton's blog post and
paper
on Bionic. (11:38)

Raymond Nimmer is not David Nimmer, who
is known for writings on copyright (18:10)

There is now an disturbing group on
identica, which is more disturbing than a tag about
disturbing. (19:15)

Joe
Brockmeier did some research on Edward Naughton's ties to
Microsoft. (20:05)

Karen mentioned a
paper on deep legal analysis of header files and on
originality requirements in copyright (24:40)

Segment 2 (26:07)



Karen wanted to clear up some confusion about the discussion
last episode about the “Open Source” and “Free
Software” terminology.






Send feedback and comments on the cast
to <[email protected]>.
You can keep in touch with Free as in Freedom on our IRC channel, #faif on irc.freenode.net, and
by following Conservancy on
identi.ca and and Twitter.

Free as in Freedom is produced by Dan Lynch
of danlynch.org.
Theme
music written and performed
by Mike Tarantino
with Charlie Paxson on drums.


The content
of this
audcast, and the accompanying show notes and music are licensed
under the Creative
Commons Attribution-Share-Alike 4.0 license (CC BY-SA 4.0).

Ver todos los episodios