This is an AI generated Episode that will discuss a video, podcast or read an article. The YouTube source provides a transcript of a discussion centered on Michael Saylor's conservative philosophy regarding Bitcoin protocol changes, drawing a comparison between the protocol and a nation's foundational laws. The hosts and Saylor criticize proposed changes, specifically referencing Bitcoin Core 30 and the ongoing "spam wars" debate, arguing that introducing unnecessary features or expanding the protocol creates "inflationary dynamics" and "moral hazard" that can destabilize the network and deprive participants of economic rights. Saylor argues for a "small protocol" approach, warning that attempts to add functionality or complexity, like the past SegWit change, can negatively impact miners and the network's security, and the discussion even hypothesizes that major entities like BlackRock could use protocol changes as an excuse to "dump" their Bitcoin holdings. Ultimately, the hosts conclude that acting against consensus and introducing non-monetary features undermines Bitcoin's purpose as sound money, although they suggest this conflict is inadvertently fostering a new free market for alternative Bitcoin clients and nodes. .Want to read the article your self? Check the original source: https://youtu.be/o8QoiK4AZhA?si=ROpJPski3QiNV6Zk

Ver todos los episodios