Podcast Cover NoteExecutive Summary — Foucault on Trial: Power, Morality, and the Tribunal of ConscienceThis podcast episode presents a Tribunal of Conscience evaluation of the philosophy of Michel Foucault, testing whether his work can withstand the strain of truth, love, and justice.The Tribunal’s Case Against Foucault:While Foucault skillfully diagnoses power structures and exposes how knowledge intertwines with domination, his rejection of universal moral principles leaves his framework fragile.The Tribunal judges this as a false form: when confronted with extreme human suffering, Foucault’s philosophy fails to offer reconciliation, restoration, or moral grounding.Grok’s Defense of Foucault:Argues that Foucault should be understood as a diagnostic tool, not a moral system.Claims Foucault never intended to offer universal ethics, and therefore should not be judged by standards he did not set.The Tribunal’s Response:Counters that Foucault’s insistence on the impossibility of moral universals is more than diagnosis — it becomes a deceptive claim, one that abandons conscience precisely when crises demand it most.Concludes that Foucault’s denial of universals risks collapsing coherence under the triune strain.The Invitation to Conscience:The episode ends by inviting listeners to weigh the evidence for themselves:Is Foucault’s work a valuable but limited diagnostic tool?Or is it a fundamentally flawed philosophy that denies the essential human need for truth, love, and justice in moments of collapse?☩ Tribunal of Conscience ☩ Truth. Love. Justice. All episodes are part of the ongoing work of the Tribunal of Conscience — testing forms under the triune strain to reveal what holds and what collapses. Follow and connect: 🌐 Tribunal Website ✉️ Subscribe for updates 🎧 Available on Apple, Spotify, and all major platforms Let those who see the structure, name it without fear.

Ver todos los episodios