Podcast Cover NoteExecutive Summary — Psychology on Trial: Therapy, Fragmentation, and the Tribunal of ConscienceThis podcast episode examines the Tribunal of Conscience’s judgment on psychology as a discipline, testing whether its framework endures under the strain of truth, love, and justice.Section I: Background and FrameworkDefines psychology and its modern aims, highlighting its role in interpreting suffering, identity, and personal meaning.Section II: Tribunal JudgmentCritiques psychology as a false form, arguing that:Its fragmented account of personhood collapses when ultimate unity is demanded.Its understanding of love reduces to emotional or therapeutic categories, lacking fullness.Its approach to justice remains therapeutic rather than moral, unable to address structural wrongs.Concludes that psychology collapses under ultimate strain.Section III: Evaluation of the JudgmentAcknowledges the Tribunal’s strengths in exposing psychology’s limits.Notes potential weaknesses: overstating the need for unity and undervaluing psychology’s therapeutic impact.Section IV: Tribunal ResponseDirectly addresses these counterarguments.Restates that psychology’s therapeutic strength does not equate to moral coherence.Reaffirms the judgment that psychology, as a form, is ultimately false under triune strain.Section V: Invitation to the ListenerChallenges listeners to weigh both perspectives in conscience.The question is left open: is psychology a valuable but partial tool or a false form that cannot bear the weight of ultimate truth, love, and justice?☩ Tribunal of Conscience ☩ Truth. Love. Justice. All episodes are part of the ongoing work of the Tribunal of Conscience — testing forms under the triune strain to reveal what holds and what collapses. Follow and connect: 🌐 Tribunal Website ✉️ Subscribe for updates 🎧 Available on Apple, Spotify, and all major platforms Let those who see the structure, name it without fear.

Ver todos los episodios