Landmark Victory! Debt Collector Did Not Deceive Debtor Who Refused to Give Name

13/04/2021 12 min Episodio 78
Landmark Victory! Debt Collector Did Not Deceive Debtor Who Refused to Give Name

Listen "Landmark Victory! Debt Collector Did Not Deceive Debtor Who Refused to Give Name"

Episode Synopsis

A debt collector must verify the identity of a communication recipient to ensure a right-party contact while also avoiding a disclosure about the existence of the debt to a third-party. Thus, a debt collector must, when asked, provide meaningful information about the purpose of a telephone call to a third-party – even when the third-party refuses to identify herself – without disclosing that the call is an attempt to collect a debt. In the latest episode of the Debt Collection Drill podcast, Moss & Barnett attorneys John Rossman and Mike Poncin are joined by attorney Aylix Jensen who elaborates on her recent, complete victory in Federal Court establishing that a debt collector did not violate the FDCPA by stating it was a “financial services company” calling regarding a “personal business matter” to an unidentified individual – the Plaintiff – who the Court identified as the correct “customer for the account.”

More episodes of the podcast The Debt Collection Drill