🎧 Listen now:Spotify:https://open.spotify.com/episode/249ZA6nHHoKmaiGYqY6Jum?si=91mGWjWJT-ur14At1KWpjAApple Podcasthttps://podcasts.apple.com/at/podcast/brazils-lesbian-dating-app-disaster-ai-security-flaw/id1846704120?i=1000732455609💔 DescriptionMarina thought she finally found safety. A lesbian dating app in Brazil — built by queer women, for queer women. Manual verification. No fake profiles. No men.Then everything went wrong.In September 2025, Sapphos launched as a sanctuary with government-ID checks. Within 48 hours, 40,000 women downloaded it. A week later, a catastrophic flaw exposed the most sensitive data of 17,000 users — IDs, photos, names, birthdays.🔍 One researcher discovered he could view anyone’s profile just by changing a number in a URL. That’s how fast “safety” can vanish when speed beats security.🧠 What This Episode CoversThis episode of AI Drama investigates how AI-generated code, underqualified devs, and “vibe coding” collided with a vulnerable community. It’s not a takedown of two activists — it’s a warning about asking for extreme trust without professional security.🎓 You’ll LearnHow a single IDOR-style bug leaked government IDs and photosWhy AI-generated code often ships with hidden flawsThe unique threats LGBTQ+ apps face in high-violence regionsWhat happened after the founders deleted evidence of the breachHow to spot red flags before uploading your ID anywhere⚠️ The Real Stakes🇧🇷 Brazil remains one of the most dangerous countries for LGBTQ+ people. Lesbian and bisexual women face three times higher rates of violence than straight women. For many Sapphos users, being outed wasn’t embarrassing — it was life-threatening.🧩 What Went WrongIdentity checks increased trust — but concentrated riskWhen one app collects IDs, selfies, and locations, a single bug exposes everythingAI sped up insecure coding — ~45 % of AI-generated code has vulnerabilitiesNo audits, no penetration tests, poor access controlLogs deleted → evidence erasedCommunication failed: instead of transparency, users saw silence and denial🚨 Red Flags Before Trusting an App✅ Verified security audits (SOC 2 / ISO 27001) ✅ Transparent privacy policy + deletion options ✅ Minimal data collection — no unnecessary IDs ✅ Public security contact or bug-bounty page ✅ Experienced, visible founding team ❌ Avoid apps claiming “100 % secure” or “completely private”🛡️ Safer Habits🔑 Use unique emails + a password manager 🕵️ Prefer privacy-preserving verification methods 📍 Turn off precise location & strip photo metadata 🆔 After any breach: change credentials, rotate IDs if possible, monitor credit💬 Notable Quotes“Marina’s only ‘mistake’ was trusting people who promised protection.”“The lesson isn’t don’t build — it’s don’t build insecure. Demand proof, not promises.”📊 Select Facts~45 % of AI-generated code shows security flawsLGBTQ+ users face more online harassmentBrazil records one LGBTQ+ person killed every ~48 hours🎙️ AI Drama is a narrative-journalism podcast about the human cost when technology fails those who trust it most. Hosted by Malcolm Werchota.🔍 SEO Keywordsdating-app breach • LGBTQ privacy • Brazil • ID verification • AI code security • queer safety

Ver todos los episodios