What would your name be without language? In this episode we explore the problem of names in truth conditional semantics, with a look at Gottlob Frege's explanation of sense and reference, Bertrand Russell's claims about the definite descriptors and Saul Kripke's term for proper names, which is 'rigid designators'. What would it be like if you weren't so rigidly designated? Truth conditional semantics is concerned with making true or false statements about the world. But what if the world and language are on two different planes of existence? What if language is a one-dimensional phenomenon attempting to delineate multidimensional experience? The most fascinating aspects of language (to me) is that it presumes and thereby constructs a self. But a one-dimensional language, it would seem, would produce very limited, superficial selves. Does inhabiting language keep us from experiencing the vastness of other dimensions? (If this question sounds familiar, you might be remembering playing with it in Episode 94, Language and the Afterlife.) It turns out that the linearity of language offers possibilities not available in other dimensions. Language, being one-dimensional, can (and does) shape itself in constantly changing ways to create new selves. The selves form spaces from which new ideas can emerge. The story I read in Episode 95 is 'The brutal linearity of language'. Sign up for the Grammar for dreamers newsletter here: jodieclark.com/newsletter Check out my course: The Grammar of Show Don't Tell: Exploring the Emotional Depths. Subscribe on Apple podcasts, Spotify or wherever you like to listen. Rate, review, tell your friends!

Ver todos los episodios