Listen "Fighting on Different Hills: Licona and Ally on the Resurrection of Jesus - Part 1"
Episode Synopsis
In 2004, Islamic scholar Dr. Shabir Ally and Dr. Mike Licona met at Regent University to debate the physical resurrection of Jesus. Both cases, a lively Q&A between the scholars and an audience Q&A make up this week’s episode. Dr. Licona presents a positive case for Jesus’ resurrection based on three nearly universally agreed-upon facts about Jesus’ death and resurrection taken from the earliest historical sources. Dr. Ally presents the negative, citing Muslim beliefs about God’s forgiveness and the testimony of the Quran on Jesus’ crucifixion, as well as varying gospel testimony, which he believes changed over time to support the idea that Jesus died on the cross and was later bodily raised. Ally claims that, like Mel Gibson, the producer of the movie The Last Temptation of Christ, the gospel writers looked at what they thought the Old Testament writings said would happen to Jesus and then wrote what they thought should have occurred based upon this. Licona, conceding gospel difficulties for the sake of the discussion only, returns to his earlier evidence, which Ally fails to address. Dr. Licona remarks that they are fighting on two different hills and tensions rise over the presentation of source evidence.
More episodes of the podcast Risen Jesus
Do Christians Need to Believe that Jesus was Raised Bodily from the Dead? Licona vs. Patterson
15/10/2025
The Historical Perspective vs. The Theological Perspective on the Resurrection: Are Both Valid?
01/10/2025
ZARZA We are Zarza, the prestigious firm behind major projects in information technology.