ZARZA We are Zarza, the prestigious firm behind major projects in information technology.
Listen "Measuring the Prevalence of Earnings Manipulations: A Novel Approach (Cade et al., 2024)"
Episode Synopsis
Welcome to Revise and Resubmit, where we break down the research shaping the way the world does business. Today’s episode takes us into the hidden corners of corporate behavior—where earnings manipulation quietly unfolds, and numbers tell more than they should.
We’re diving into the paper “Measuring the Prevalence of Earnings Manipulations: A Novel Approach,” authored by Nicole L. Cade, Joshua L. Gunn, and Alex J. Vandenberg, and published in the esteemed Journal of Accounting Research—a proud member of the FT50 journal list, representing the very best in business research. This paper isn’t just another attempt to uncover accounting mischief; it’s a bold new approach, recruiting nearly 1,000 executives from companies in the Russell 3000 Index to disclose their practices.
What’s fascinating is how the researchers used a list experiment—a clever technique that offers respondents more privacy, making it easier to admit uncomfortable truths. In this experiment, nearly 30% of firms reported engaging in real earnings management, and 12.4% revealed involvement in accounting fraud—a much higher admission rate than traditional surveys captured. These findings challenge what we think we know: Are firms manipulating numbers more often than we suspect, or are they just better at hiding it?
We owe a debt of gratitude to the authors and Wiley Periodicals LLC for making this research open access, bringing these critical insights to the public eye.
So here’s the question: If numbers can be twisted in so many ways, how do we know which ones to trust? Stay with us as we dig deeper into this remarkable study, exploring the fine line between strategic accounting and manipulation—and what it means for investors, regulators, and the future of corporate governance.
Reference
CADE, N. L., GUNN, J. L., & VANDENBERG, A. J. (2024). Measuring the Prevalence of Earnings Manipulations: A Novel Approach. Journal of Accounting Research.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12562
We’re diving into the paper “Measuring the Prevalence of Earnings Manipulations: A Novel Approach,” authored by Nicole L. Cade, Joshua L. Gunn, and Alex J. Vandenberg, and published in the esteemed Journal of Accounting Research—a proud member of the FT50 journal list, representing the very best in business research. This paper isn’t just another attempt to uncover accounting mischief; it’s a bold new approach, recruiting nearly 1,000 executives from companies in the Russell 3000 Index to disclose their practices.
What’s fascinating is how the researchers used a list experiment—a clever technique that offers respondents more privacy, making it easier to admit uncomfortable truths. In this experiment, nearly 30% of firms reported engaging in real earnings management, and 12.4% revealed involvement in accounting fraud—a much higher admission rate than traditional surveys captured. These findings challenge what we think we know: Are firms manipulating numbers more often than we suspect, or are they just better at hiding it?
We owe a debt of gratitude to the authors and Wiley Periodicals LLC for making this research open access, bringing these critical insights to the public eye.
So here’s the question: If numbers can be twisted in so many ways, how do we know which ones to trust? Stay with us as we dig deeper into this remarkable study, exploring the fine line between strategic accounting and manipulation—and what it means for investors, regulators, and the future of corporate governance.
Reference
CADE, N. L., GUNN, J. L., & VANDENBERG, A. J. (2024). Measuring the Prevalence of Earnings Manipulations: A Novel Approach. Journal of Accounting Research.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12562
In God we trust