Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings against G. Prasad Raghavan, accused of cheating and conspiracy in a Puducherry land fraud case. Held - There was no evidence of inducement or involvement by Raghavan, as he was a minor when the alleged fraud occurred and later purchased the property legitimately. This decision clarifies the requirement of “active involvement” for criminal liability in property transactions.Key Takeaways:✅ Mere familial association or subsequent purchase does not constitute criminal intent.✅ Courts must avoid “roving inquiries” absent direct evidence against the accused.Statutes:✅ IPC: Sections 420 (Cheating), 406 (Criminal Breach of Trust), 294(b), 506, 34✅ CrPC: Section 239#SupremeCourt #CriminalLaw #PropertyLaw #IPC

Ver todos los episodios