Rating the evidence - good and bad science - Panel Discussion #3 | #GFN24

GFN News
23/07/2024 1h 30min
Rating the evidence - good and bad science - Panel Discussion #3 | #GFN24

Listen "Rating the evidence - good and bad science - Panel Discussion #3 | #GFN24"

Descargar episodio Ver en sitio original

Episode Synopsis

The hosts, together with a panel representing scientists, consumers and other stakeholders will review a selection of scientific papers, published in the past 12 months, on nicotine and THR-related issues, identifying the best and worst examples.

GFN 2024 Panel Discussion #3 - hosted by Clive Bates with panellists: Arielle Selya, Gizelle Baker and Roberto Sussman.

More episodes of the podcast GFN News

#GFN25 Science Lab Discussions #2 | Removing Aroma Compounds From Nicotine Extract 22/10/2025
GFN News #161 | ARE BELGIAN VAPE LAWS HELPING OR HURTING PUBLIC HEALTH? 20/10/2025
GFN Voices 2025 #15 | HOW CANADA IS FIGHTING FOR TOBACCO HARM REDUCTION? 17/10/2025
GFN25 Panel Discussion #5 | Who else should be in the room? 15/10/2025
GFN News #160 | WHO's FCTC COP11 - Challenges & Lack of Consumer Impact Explained | GFN News 13/10/2025
GFN.TV Interviews | STONEWALLED | The March Toward Nicotine Prohibition 10/10/2025
#GFN25 Science Lab Discussions #1 | Nicotine content and nicotine uptake 08/10/2025
GFN News #159 | Vaping ER “Surge” - What The Data Really Shows? 06/10/2025
GFN Voices 2025 #14 | Why Harm Reduction Matters? 03/10/2025
GFN Voices 2025 #13 | HOW TO CUT TOBACCO HARM IN LMICs? 01/10/2025
© 2003-2025 ZARZA | AHEAD OF OUR TIME
privacy policy
In God we trust In God we trust
PreSales Questions? Click Here
or call our toll-free line at +1-888-5002068 Miami, Florida, USA