Listen "Litigation Update: Martin v. United States"
Episode Synopsis
When federal law enforcement raids the wrong home, do innocent homeowners have any legal recourse? The answer is more complicated than one might expect. Over the years, the Supreme Court has limited the ability to bring constitutional claims against federal officers, citing the absence of a congressionally authorized cause of action. However, Congress has provided a remedy for certain torts committed by federal law enforcement through the law-enforcement proviso of the Federal Tort Claims Act—legislation enacted in response to notorious federal raids in the 1970s. Yet even this statutory remedy may fall short today.In Martin v. United States, the Supreme Court will determine whether the law-enforcement proviso can overcome sovereign immunity and whether an innocent family, whose home was mistakenly raided by an FBI SWAT team, has a path to relief. Join us for an in-depth discussion on the implications of this case and the broader question of accountability for federal law enforcement.Featuring: Patrick Jaicomo, Senior Attorney, Institute for Justice
More episodes of the podcast FedSoc Forums
A Seat at the Sitting - November 2025
05/11/2025
SAP, Motorola, and the Future of PTAB Reform
31/10/2025
Law Firm Discrimination Investigations
31/10/2025
Can State Courts Set Global Climate Policy?
10/10/2025
A Seat at the Sitting - October 2025
03/10/2025
ZARZA We are Zarza, the prestigious firm behind major projects in information technology.