Listen "The Moment a Catholic Apologist Destroyed His Own Argument | Weighed in the Balance Ep. 36"
Episode Synopsis
Send us a textCatholic apologist Joe Heschmeyer just made a stunning admission — and he probably didn’t even realize it. In this episode of Weighed in the Balance, Jonathan Brooks reacts to Heschmeyer’s claim that the Bible’s canon was known long before it was ever “infallibly defined.” What does that mean for Rome’s argument that Protestants need an infallible Magisterium to know which books belong in Scripture? Jonathan breaks it all down with sharp analysis, historical insight, and a bit of irony that you won’t want to miss.Timestamps 00:00 – The “Worst” Catholic arguments ranked 03:15 – Assurance of salvation and confusion with “once saved, always saved” 08:00 – Why Protestants say “Roman Catholic” instead of “Catholic” 13:00 – The real meaning of the Whore of Babylon 16:00 – Did Rome really kill millions in the Dark Ages? 20:00 – Did Catholics add books to the Bible? 26:00 – The line Joe Heschmeyer shouldn’t have said 27:15 – Why his admission undercuts Rome’s entire canon argumentSupport the showDo you think this claim is found wanting? Let us know on social!! Click here to find us everywhere!!
More episodes of the podcast Weighed in the Balance
The Most Offensive Truth in Christianity: You Contribute Nothing | Weighed in the Balance Ep. 34
09/10/2025
Joe Heschmeyer’s Dogma Disaster: Why Rome Still Misses the Gospel | Weighed in the Balance Ep. 33
07/10/2025
ZARZA We are Zarza, the prestigious firm behind major projects in information technology.