Do adoption fees really protect animals — or do they just make us feel better? For years, many in animal welfare have believed that adoption fees act as a safeguard: if someone can't afford the fee, how will they afford the pet? Free adoptions, the argument goes, invite impulse decisions and bad outcomes. In this episode, I explain why I once believed that too — and why I've changed my mind. Drawing on my experience working directly with shelters, serving on the board of the Pennsylvania SPCA, and running programs that connect people and animals, I examine what actually happens during fee-waived adoption events. I also take a close look at the research often cited to support free adoptions — including its strengths and its limitations — and explain why the data is encouraging, but not definitive. This isn't a simple pro- or anti-fee argument. It's a conversation about shelter capacity, long-stay animals, euthanasia for space, and what really protects animals in a system under strain. Key topics include: Why adoption fees were thought to be a protective filter What shelters see in real life during fee-waived events The limits of survey-based research on adoption outcomes Why fees don't measure commitment — and what does When fee-waived adoptions work, and when they don't If you work in animal welfare, sheltering, or advocacy — or if you care about evidence-based policy for animals — this episode is for you. You can find more resources and past episodes at AnimalAdvocacyAcademy.com.

Ver todos los episodios