In this investigative episode, Malcolm Werchota dissects the LocalMind disaster and exposes the myth that geography equals security.Learn why Microsoft’s cloud is safer than local startups, how to run proper AI vendor security audits, and the five technical questions every organization must ask before adopting AI tools.Key takeaways: • “Local and secure” is marketing, not magic • The 77% AI startup breach rate nobody talks about • Third-party audit obligations under GDPR • Spotting AI-generated code vulnerabilities • The five security questions that save careersIf you’re evaluating AI vendors or already using AI tools with sensitive data, this episode might just save your organization from becoming the next LocalMind.🔍 Episode SummaryThe LocalMind catastrophe is a wake-up call for any organization trusting AI vendors with confidential data. Marketed as the GDPR-compliant alternative to Microsoft Copilot, the startup’s “local and secure” slogan masked catastrophic vulnerabilities — from unencrypted passwords to exposed network access. The breach went undetected for seven months, cost €47,000 in direct response, and left hundreds of clients unnotified when the company abruptly vanished.Malcolm breaks down what went wrong, explains why cloud giants actually offer stronger security, and shares a practical due-diligence checklist to evaluate AI vendors safely.🧩 Key Topics CoveredLocalMind Breach Timeline: From Marcus’s GDPR-driven decision to Thomas’s discovery of unrestricted access“Vibe Coding” Vulnerabilities: How AI-generated code creates systematic riskThe Data Sovereignty Myth: Why Austrian servers ≠ securityVendor Security Audit Framework: The five critical questions to vet AI suppliersGDPR Compliance Reality Check: Incident obligations, costs, and fine exposurePractical Risk Assessment: Red flags and documentation SMEs can request immediately💬 Notable Quotes“Geography is not a security control. LocalMind being in Austria made it less secure than Microsoft’s cloud infrastructure.”“If a vendor can’t explain how they store credentials or handle incidents — walk away.”“Seventy-seven percent of AI startups reported breaches. The question isn’t if — it’s how prepared they are.”“‘Local and secure’ was never a security guarantee. It was just good marketing.”🛠️ Actionable TakeawaysDemand Third-Party Security Audits Require proof of SOC2/ISO 27001 audits — no audit, no deal.Ask These 5 Questions:How are credentials stored?What’s your incident response plan?When was your last independent security audit?How do you segment customer networks?Who has admin access, and how is it monitored?Challenge “Local = Safe.” Major cloud providers spend billions on security infrastructure.Check AI Code Review Practices. 68% of vendors use AI-generated code; insist on manual review evidence.Verify Incident Transparency. Ask vendors how they handled their most recent security issue.Understand GDPR Liability. Your AI vendor = your data processor. Their failure = your responsibility.MALCOLM’S CONTACTSLinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/malcolmwerchota Website: werchota.ai YouTube: youtube.com/@werchota X (Twitter): x.com/malcolmwerchota Facebook: facebook.com/AI-Cookbook-by-Malcolm-Werchota Instagram: @malcolmwerchotaai TikTok: tiktok.com/malcolmwerchota📧 Email: [email protected] 📮 Feedback: [email protected] 🎓 AI Fit Academy: werchota.ai/ai-fit-academy

Ver todos los episodios