As engineering teams grow, many organizations expect velocity to increase, but often the opposite happens. In this episode, we will explore the invisible costs of scaling headcount without evolving your system architecture. From onboarding delays to tangled communication paths and team overlap, we break down why more people often leads to less effective delivery.We dive into the architectural principles that help teams scale safely: service boundaries, team ownership models, platform thinking, and clarity in decision-making. You’ll learn how Conway’s Law plays out in real life, why communication debt is a real and the most dangerous form of technical debt, and how to design systems that support autonomous teams instead of slowing them down.In our company spotlight, we break down what happened to Twitter/X after Elon Musk’s acquisition, how radical business changes exposed architectural fragility, and what lessons tech leaders can take from it. What does it mean when 80% of your engineering organization disappears overnight? Will systems survive or fail?We discuss:Why adding engineers does not always increase velocityHow communication debt becomes the real bottleneckPatterns and principles that help teams scale safelyWhat Twitter’s post-acquisition architecture reveals about org-to-system alignmentThe architect’s role in building scalable structures and guardrailsWhether your team is doubling or just stretched thin, this episode offers practical insight into designing for growth, not just surviving it.Send us a textReach us @ LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/maxim-silaevhttps://www.linkedin.com/in/dr-nikita-golovko

Ver todos los episodios