Episode 31: Does double-blind peer review reduce bias?

Special Issue
13/11/2019 19 min
Episode 31: Does double-blind peer review reduce bias?

Listen "Episode 31: Does double-blind peer review reduce bias?"

Descargar episodio Ver en sitio original

Episode Synopsis

The British Ecological Society is running an experiment to see whether the benefits of double-blind peer review are what we think they are.

More episodes of the podcast Special Issue

Episode 61: Societies delivering for their communities: A conversation with ACAMH 25/11/2024
Episode 60: Sustainable Societies and Communities without Barriers 30/01/2024
Episode 59: Tackling Equity in Open Access, Together: A Conversation with Research4Life 02/08/2023
Episode 58: An Interview With the Tri-Societies: OA and the Role of Transformational Agreements 12/06/2023
Episode 57: The Journal of the Future: Developing Journal Mission and the Role of Refer & Transfer 05/04/2023
Episode 56: How To Articulate Your Value to Your Communities: An Interview with FENS Society 09/02/2023
Episode 55: Case Study: Joint-Society OA Journal 09/11/2022
Episode 54: Case Studies for Engaging and Including ECRs 12/08/2022
Episode 53: How Societies Can Diversify Revenue 03/06/2022
Episode 52: Risk Governance and Minimizing Liability on Not-For-Profit Boards 05/04/2022
© 2003-2025 ZARZA | AHEAD OF OUR TIME
privacy policy
In God we trust In God we trust
PreSales Questions? Click Here
or call our toll-free line at +1-888-5002068 Miami, Florida, USA