Secretary of State Marco Rubio faced significant legal challenges this week as a federal judge ruled that his administration violated the First Amendment rights of international students and faculty members. The landmark decision found that Rubio, along with Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, deliberately targeted non-citizen pro-Palestinian advocates for deportation based on their protected political speech.The ruling came after a two-week bench trial in July, where evidence showed the Trump administration used the controversial website Canary Mission to investigate over 5,000 people who attended pro-Palestine protests. US District Court Judge William Young declared that the secretaries intentionally conspired to chill free speech rights and terrorize pro-Palestinian voices into silence.The case centered on the administration's attempt to deport individuals like Mahmoud Khalil, a green card holder who helped organize protests at Columbia University. Judge Young emphasized that the First Amendment applies equally to non-citizens lawfully present in the United States, writing that no law means no law when it comes to constitutional protections.Meanwhile, Rubio has been dealing with international tensions as Iran announced it would suspend cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency following the reimposition of UN sanctions. In a September 27th statement, Rubio said the sanctions send a clear message that Iran will be held accountable, while maintaining that diplomacy remains an option if Iran accepts direct talks.Cuban Foreign Minister also criticized Rubio this week, accusing him of pursuing a personal and corrupt agenda that runs counter to President Trump's peace initiatives. These diplomatic tensions highlight the complex challenges facing Rubio's State Department.The constitutional ruling represents a significant setback for the administration's immigration enforcement efforts, with the judge noting that the policy continues to unconstitutionally chill free speech today. Legal experts suggest this decision could have far-reaching implications for how the government handles political dissent among non-citizens.Thank you for tuning in and make sure to subscribe. This has been a quiet please production, for more check out quiet please dot ai.For more http://www.quietplease.aiGet the best deals https://amzn.to/3ODvOtaThis content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI

Ver todos los episodios