ZARZA We are Zarza, the prestigious firm behind major projects in information technology.
Listen "The Resurrection - Argument from Personal Incredulity or Methodological Naturalism - Licona vs. Dillahunty - Part 1"
Episode Synopsis
In this episode, Dr. Licona provides a positive case for the resurrection of Jesus at the 2017 [UN]Apologetic Conference in Austin, Texas. He bases his argument on contentions that 1) empirical data strongly suggests that reality has a supernatural dimension and 2) that historical data strongly suggests that Jesus rose from the dead. Mr. Dillahunty, an atheist activist and former Christian, disagrees, positing that there is not sufficient evidence for this conclusion. Instead, those who believe in Jesus’ bodily resurrection are committing the fallacious argument from personal incredulity. This means they take on this belief because they can’t find a better explanation for the historical evidence. Licona responds that Dillahunty is steeped in methodological naturalism, and the debate continues.
More episodes of the podcast Risen Jesus
Do Christians Need to Believe that Jesus was Raised Bodily from the Dead? Licona vs. Patterson
15/10/2025
The Historical Perspective vs. The Theological Perspective on the Resurrection: Are Both Valid?
01/10/2025
In God we trust