English Podcast Starts at 00:00:00Bengali Podcast Starts at 00:14:37Hindi Podcast Starts at 00:30:10German Podcast Starts at 00:44:17ReferenceAshraf, M., Deore, A. & Krishnan, R. The role of identity in corporate governance: evidence from gender differences in the audit committee chair-chief financial officer dyad. Rev Account Stud (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-025-09921-4Welcome to “Revise and Resubmit” 🎙️✨The podcast where dense academic papers loosen their ties, kick off their shoes, and tell you what they really mean.Today, we’re diving into a powerful new article that asks a deceptively simple question:👉 What happens in corporate governance when the people watching the numbers don’t quite “see themselves” in the people reporting the numbers?The paper is titled:📄 “The role of identity in corporate governance: evidence from gender differences in the audit committee chair–chief financial officer dyad”by Musaib Ashraf, Aishwarrya Deore & Ranjani Krishnan,published online on 18 November 2025 in Review of Accounting Studies — yes, that prestigious, FT50-listed journal 🏆📚 — and brought to you by Springer Nature.In this episode, we zoom into one crucial governance relationship:the audit committee chair on one side of the table, and the chief financial officer (CFO) on the other.Identity theory tells us something uncomfortable: people tend to trust those who feel like part of their “in-group” and to mistrust those who seem “different.” 😶‍🌫️So this paper asks:💡 When the chair and the CFO are of different genders, does trust quietly erode… and does monitoring ramp up to fill that gap?The authors trace that subtle identity gap into very concrete boardroom behavior:More audit committee meetings 📆Tighter monitoring of the CFO 🔍Especially pronounced when the chair is female and the CFO is maleThey also show when this effect softens:When the firm builds value-based controls and a culture of diversity tolerance 🌈When the CFO’s seniority makes them look more trustworthy and established 🧭But here’s the twist:All that extra scrutiny?It doesn’t seem to make financial reporting better. ❌📊Instead, it appears to distract the CFO, pulling attention away from running the business and nudging operational performance downward 📉In other words, identity-driven mistrust can be real, measurable, and costly in ways we don’t always see in the financial statements.So, in this episode of “Revise and Resubmit”, we’re going to unpack:🎯 How identity quietly shapes governance dynamics at the very top🎯 Why more monitoring isn’t always better monitoring🎯 How diversity, trust, and performance get tangled in the audit committee–CFO relationshipBefore we jump in, a quick reminder:🔔 Subscribe to “Revise and Resubmit” on Spotify and on Amazon Prime and Apple Podcast so you never miss an episode.📺 And if you like to see your research with charts, highlights, and visuals, subscribe to our YouTube channel “Weekend Researcher” — where complex papers become weekend-friendly stories. 🎧📊📺A huge thank you to the authors Musaib Ashraf, Aishwarrya Deore & Ranjani Krishnan, and to the publisher Springer Nature, for this thought-provoking contribution in the FT50 journal, Review of Accounting Studies 🙏📚So as you listen, here’s the question to keep in mind:🤔 If identity can silently reshape trust and monitoring at the top of the firm, what hidden governance costs might be lurking in your own boardroom relationships right now?

Ver todos los episodios