The Hidden Dangers of Debate: Why It Can Legitimize Bad IdeasIn this episode of PsyberSpace®, host Leslie Poston explores the unintended consequences of debate formats in media, arguing that they often function as tools to distribute and legitimize harmful ideas rather than dismantling them with facts. Poston discusses psychological principles such as social proof, the illusory truth effect, and the continued influence effect to explain why debates can amplify bad ideas. She advocates for alternative approaches such as weight of evidence framing, pre-bunking tactics, and audience-centered harm reduction to effectively combat misinformation and reduce harm.00:00 Introduction to Debate Content01:14 The Unseen Consequences of Debates02:06 The Psychology Behind Debate Failures04:13 False Balance in Media05:44 The Illusory Truth Effect07:43 Debate as Entertainment09:38 Incentives and Bad Faith Tactics14:13 Strategies for Harm Reduction16:20 Practical Tips for Responding to Misinformation18:30 Conclusion and Final Thoughts

★ Support this podcast ★

Ver todos los episodios