Listen "The key difference between Schopenhauer and existentialism"
Episode Synopsis
John Vespasian explains that Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860) would have been amused to see philosophers like Jean-Paul Sartre (1905-1980) theorise about anxiety and personal authenticity. Sartre didn’t regard as self-evident that individuals are aware of their freedom and the need to make constant choices. In contrast to Sartre and other existentialists, Schopenhauer considered self-evident that happiness is the purpose of life; he had taken that idea from Aristotle (384-322 BC) and viewed it as obviously true. Schopenhauer didn’t spend a minute worrying about anxiety and personal authenticity because he viewed them a non-issues in the quest for personal happiness. He considered it healthy, reasonable and proper that people want to improve their lives. The objective of philosophy is to help individuals make better choices and attain happiness, not to worry about non-issues. This point marks a major difference between Schopenhauer and existentialism. Here is the link to the original article: https://johnvespasian.com/the-key-difference-between-schopenhauer-and-existentialism/
More episodes of the podcast John Vespasian
Schopenhauer’s views on wisdom
21/10/2025
Aristotle’s theory of the prime mover
21/10/2025
Michel de Montaigne and human nature
16/10/2025
Michel de Montaigne’s thoughts on friendship
16/10/2025
The essays by Michel de Montaigne
14/10/2025