In the past several days, John Ratcliffe has continued to play a central role as Director of the Central Intelligence Agency, especially amid renewed scrutiny of US intelligence and events tied to the aftermath of the 2016 presidential election. Tensions between US intelligence agencies have escalated, highlighted by an incident where the Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, inadvertently disclosed the identity of a covert CIA officer specializing in Russia. According to reporting from the Wall Street Journal, this breach of secrecy was not coordinated with the CIA and led to internal conflict between Gabbard and Ratcliffe, further straining the relationship between the offices as they clash over the handling of classified information and the proper response to Russian election interference.In another major development, John Ratcliffe recently initiated a review focused on the intelligence community’s assessment of Russia’s efforts to influence the 2016 election. As outlined by the Washington Times, the review specifically addresses whether the original intelligence analysis was conducted through proper procedures, or, as Ratcliffe’s team suggested, had been shaped by a politically charged and potentially compromised process. The findings from Ratcliffe’s review have increased calls in Washington for increased transparency, and have been cited by former President Trump as evidence for further investigation of former intelligence leaders.This drive for accountability led Ratcliffe to send what he described as evidence of wrongdoing by John Brennan to FBI Director Kash Patel for criminal investigation. The focus has been on interactions between Brennan and former FBI Director James Comey, with new legal actions targeting Comey just as the statute of limitations for alleged false statements threatens to expire. The US Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Virginia, under new leadership, is reportedly moving swiftly to present the case to a grand jury. Ratcliffe’s referral described Brennan’s and Comey’s conversations as a conspiracy, and the FBI launched a criminal investigation of both men as a result, as detailed by several outlets including the Washington Times and ABC News.On social media and in direct statements, Ratcliffe has emphasized his mission to end what he calls the weaponization of US intelligence. His moves have been met with support from President Trump, who has personally pressured the Department of Justice for action against former officials he considers adversaries. Despite these dramatic actions, those who were targeted, including Comey and Brennan, have consistently stood by the integrity of their work on Russian interference and argue their assessments are backed by both congressional and special counsel investigations. According to Good Morning America, the process remains fraught with internal dissension, as some prosecutors argued against indicting Comey for lack of evidence, but political pressure has ensured the matter is prioritized before critical deadlines.Thank you for tuning in, listeners, and do not forget to subscribe. This has been a quiet please production, for more check out quiet please dot ai.For more http://www.quietplease.aiGet the best deals https://amzn.to/3ODvOtaThis content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI

Ver todos los episodios