The value of the lawsuit lay in the act of filing it itself. The suit served as a public "warning" to other states and jurisdictions considering similar policies and was perceived by some as an attempt to "intimidate" state judges into complying with the federal executive's policies. The case, therefore, demonstrates the use of the judicial system by an executive branch to exert political pressure and assert dominance, even without a strong legal or factual foundation.The challenge facing federal courts is not only the complexity of habeas law but also the sheer volume of petitions filed each year. Federal courts receive approximately 10,000 to 19,000 habeas petitions annually, constituting about 4% of the total federal district court civil caseload.6 This high volume, coupled with the stringent procedural requirements of AEDPA, creates a significant administrative burden.Trump admin lawsuit v Maryland judges Courtesy of Associated Press Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/go-beyond-the-brief--6353252/support.

Ver todos los episodios