Listen "Do AI As Science Instead"
Episode Synopsis
Few AI experiments constitute meaningful tests of hypotheses. As a branch of machine learning research, AI science has concentrated on black box investigation of training time phenomena. The best of this work is has been scientifically excellent. However, the hypotheses tested are mainly irrelevant to user and societal concerns. https://betterwithout.ai/AI-as-science This chapter references Chapman's essay, "How should we evaluate progress in AI?" https://metarationality.com/artificial-intelligence-progress "Troubling Trends in Machine Learning Scholarship", Zachary C. Lipton and Jacob Steinhardt: https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.03341 You can support the podcast and get episodes a week early, by supporting the Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/m/fluidityaudiobooks If you like the show, consider buying me a coffee: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/mattarnold Original music by Kevin MacLeod. This podcast is under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial International 4.0 License.
More episodes of the podcast Fluidity
A Better Future, Without Backprop
19/01/2025
Do AI As Engineering Instead
15/12/2024
Do AI As Science And Engineering Instead
08/09/2024
Futurism, Politics, and Responsibility
23/06/2024
A Future We Would Like
16/06/2024
ZARZA We are Zarza, the prestigious firm behind major projects in information technology.