Can you even call it a return if the character didn't appear in previous films? For a film series based on found footage, this one sure does rely on things having already happened offscreen. I am truly puzzled by some of the choices this "retooling" did. Listen to some thoughts from me and Greg on the Paranormal Activity franchise as a whole and the truly surprising plot points of this new one, Paranormal Activity 7: Casper Returns. (More like Paranormie Activity, am I right? That reminds me: ParaNorman is worth watching, so check that out.)
7:30 - Jhonen Vasquez explains why you're watching Zim wrong.
8:20 - David Lynch on iPhone
9:45 - Family Guy - How David Lynch Stole Christmas!
15:30 - The Paranormal Activity wiki still needs to add the events of the seventh film and Tokyo Night to this (or maybe they're not sure how to given how messy the timeline is now), but here's the series timeline.
21:00 - We recorded this on April 13. Also, this is the 13th episode of this season. Number 13 of season 1 was on Ghostbusters: Afterlife, which also had a mention of Casper. Coincidence? Yes.
24:35 - Check out The Boss Baby: Family Business episode.
31:36 - Saying "OP" here again.
43:00 - Come to think of it, maybe any of the alternate endings of previous films can be canon because of time travel? I don't know. I give up.
University of Sussex Sci-Fi & Horror Society: Discord | Facebook
University of Sussex Star Wars Society: Discord
Sussex Video Gaming Society: Discord | Facebook
Star Trek Culture: YouTube
Steven Shinder Plugs: Book | Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | Website
Email [email protected]

Ver todos los episodios