ZARZA We are Zarza, the prestigious firm behind major projects in information technology.
Listen "Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 36: In re B.M. (C.A.A.F. 2024)"
Episode Synopsis
In this episode of CAAF Chats, we examine CAAF’s latest opinion concerning their jurisdiction to hear appeals brought by crime victims. Specifically, this case clarifies who has standing to appeal a ruling by a military judge.
Connect with The Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center and School by visiting our website at https://tjaglcs.army.mil/ or on Facebook (tjaglcs), Instagram (tjaglcs), or LinkedIn (school/tjaglcs).
Connect with The Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center and School by visiting our website at https://tjaglcs.army.mil/ or on Facebook (tjaglcs), Instagram (tjaglcs), or LinkedIn (school/tjaglcs).
More episodes of the podcast Criminal Law Department Presents
Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 63: United States v. Davis (C.A.A.F. 2025)
19/11/2025
Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 62: United States v. Johnson (C.A.A.F. 2025)
05/11/2025
Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 61: United States v. Greene-Watson (C.A.A.F. 2025)
23/10/2025
Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 60: United States v. Casillas (C.A.A.F. 2025)
24/09/2025
Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 59: United States v. George (C.A.A.F. 2025)
10/09/2025
Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 58: United States v. Patterson (C.A.A.F. 2025)
10/09/2025
Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 56: United States v. Harborth (C.A.A.F. 2025)
06/08/2025
In God we trust