ZARZA We are Zarza, the prestigious firm behind major projects in information technology.
Listen "Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 32: U.S. v. Ramirez (C.A.A.F 2024)"
Episode Synopsis
In this episode, we discuss CAAF's decision in United States v. Ramirez. Specifically, we examine when a military judge must allow questions concerning racial bias during voir dire - while discussing voir dire and bias generally. Connect with The Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center and School by visiting our website at https://tjaglcs.army.mil/ or on Facebook (tjaglcs), Instagram (tjaglcs), or LinkedIn (school/tjaglcs).
More episodes of the podcast Criminal Law Department Presents
Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 63: United States v. Davis (C.A.A.F. 2025)
19/11/2025
Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 62: United States v. Johnson (C.A.A.F. 2025)
05/11/2025
Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 61: United States v. Greene-Watson (C.A.A.F. 2025)
23/10/2025
Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 60: United States v. Casillas (C.A.A.F. 2025)
24/09/2025
Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 59: United States v. George (C.A.A.F. 2025)
10/09/2025
Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 58: United States v. Patterson (C.A.A.F. 2025)
10/09/2025
Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 56: United States v. Harborth (C.A.A.F. 2025)
06/08/2025
In God we trust