ZARZA We are Zarza, the prestigious firm behind major projects in information technology.
Listen "Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 15: U.S. v. McAlhaney, XX MJ XXX (C.A.A.F. 2023)"
Episode Synopsis
In this narrow case, the CAAF looks at whether an adjudged reprimand was appropriate as written as part of its sentence appropriateness review under Article 66(d)(1), Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ).
Connect with The Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center and School on Facebook (tjaglcs), LinkedIn (tjaglcs), or visit our website for more resources at https://tjaglcs.army.mil/leapp
You can also connect directly with the Criminal Law Department on Facebook (tjaglcs_crimlaw) or Instagram (tjaglcs_crimlaw)
Connect with The Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center and School on Facebook (tjaglcs), LinkedIn (tjaglcs), or visit our website for more resources at https://tjaglcs.army.mil/leapp
You can also connect directly with the Criminal Law Department on Facebook (tjaglcs_crimlaw) or Instagram (tjaglcs_crimlaw)
More episodes of the podcast Criminal Law Department Presents
Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 63: United States v. Davis (C.A.A.F. 2025)
19/11/2025
Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 62: United States v. Johnson (C.A.A.F. 2025)
05/11/2025
Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 61: United States v. Greene-Watson (C.A.A.F. 2025)
23/10/2025
Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 60: United States v. Casillas (C.A.A.F. 2025)
24/09/2025
Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 59: United States v. George (C.A.A.F. 2025)
10/09/2025
Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 58: United States v. Patterson (C.A.A.F. 2025)
10/09/2025
Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 56: United States v. Harborth (C.A.A.F. 2025)
06/08/2025
In God we trust