Listen "Episode 210: Capacity Assessment"
Episode Synopsis
We discuss capacity assessment, patient autonomy, safety, and documentation.
Hosts:
Anne Levine, MD
Brian Gilberti, MD
https://media.blubrry.com/coreem/content.blubrry.com/coreem/Capacity_Assessment.mp3
Download
One Comment
Show Notes
The Importance of Capacity Assessment
Arises frequently in the ED, even when not formally recognized
Carries both legal implications and ethical weight
Failure to appropriately assess capacity can result in:
Forced treatment without justification
Missed opportunities to respect autonomy
Increased risk of litigation and poor patient outcomes
Defining Capacity
Capacity is:
Decision-specific: varies based on the medical choice at hand
Time-specific: can fluctuate due to medical conditions, intoxication, delirium
Distinct from competency, which is a legal determination
Relies on a patient’s ability to:
Understand relevant information
Appreciate the consequences
Reason through options
Communicate a clear choice
Real-World ED Examples
Intoxicated patient with head trauma refusing CT
Unreliable neuro exam
Potentially time-sensitive intracranial injury
Elderly patient with sepsis refusing admission due to caregiving responsibilities
Balancing autonomy vs. beneficence
Patient with gangrenous diabetic foot refusing surgery
Demonstrates logic and consistency despite high-risk decision
The 4 Pillars of Capacity Assessment
Understanding
Can the patient explain:
Their condition
Recommended treatments
Risks and benefits
Alternatives and outcomes?
Sample prompts:
“What are the options for your situation?”
“What might happen if we do nothing?”
Appreciation
Does the patient grasp the personal relevance of the information?
Sample prompts:
“Why do you think we’re recommending this?”
“How do you think this condition could affect you?”
Reasoning
Can the patient logically explain their choice?
Must demonstrate a rational process, even if the outcome seems unwise
Sample prompts:
“What factors are you considering in making this decision?”
“What led you to this conclusion?”
Choice
Is the patient able to clearly communicate a decision?
Any modality acceptable: verbal, written, gestural
Sample prompts:
“We’ve discussed several options. What do you want to do?”
“Have you decided what option is best for you?”
Common ED Challenges & Solutions
Time Pressure
Capacity assessments can be time-consuming
Yet, patients leaving AMA without proper evaluation are at higher risk:
↑ 30-day mortality
↑ 30-day readmission
Communication Barriers
Language differences → use certified interpreters
Cognitive impairment or psych illness → clarify baseline status
Noisy ED environment → relocate to quiet space
Use simple language, avoid jargon
Ethical Dilemmas
Providers may disagree with patient choices
Ensure decision-making process—not the choice itself—is being judged
Use tools like the Aid to Capacity Evaluation (ACE)
When uncertain, consult Psychiatry or Risk Management
Best Practices in Documentation
Clearly document:
The patient’s understanding, appreciation, reasoning, and choice
Information delivered:
Condition
Treatment recommendations
Alternatives and risks
Patient’s responses and logic
Witnesses to the conversation
Any discharge instructions, including:
Follow-up plans
Prescriptions provided
Return precautions
Also document:
If patient refused treatment, document:
That risks and benefits were clearly explained
That refusal was voluntary
If treatment was administered despite objection:
Document rationale for presumed lack of capacity
Legal/ethical justification for action
Involvement of other services (e.g., Psychiatry, Risk)
More episodes of the podcast Core EM - Emergency Medicine Podcast
Episode 215: Marburg Virus and Global EM
01/11/2025
Episode 214: Acute Pulmonary Embolism
02/10/2025
Episode 213: Pneumothorax
01/09/2025
Episode 212: Angioedema
02/08/2025
Episode 209: Blast Crisis
01/05/2025
Episode 208: Geriatric Emergency Medicine
15/04/2025
Episode 207: Smoke Inhalation Injury
02/04/2025
Episode 206: Acute Back Pain
03/03/2025
ZARZA We are Zarza, the prestigious firm behind major projects in information technology.