Listen "Ep 35: PruittData"
Episode Synopsis
What led to a recent series of research paper retractions in behavioral ecology? How do scientists trust the data their collaborators share? Earlier this year, several journals retracted papers using data collected by the biologist, Jonathan Pruitt, data that upon inspection were found to have several problems. On this episode, we talk with Dan Bolnick, Editor-in-Chief of The American Naturalist, one of the journals involved in the retractions. We talked with Dan about how he and others discovered the problems, the current status of the investigation, and the consequences of the flawed data for other authors on the retracted papers and the field as a whole. Check out our website, bigbiology.org, for more resources on this topic. Episode art: Bernard Dupont (CC BY-SA 2.0) This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit bigbiology.substack.com
More episodes of the podcast Big Biology
Ahead of the (thermal) curve (Ep 122)
26/09/2024
The future of Big Biology
23/05/2024
Shifting mutational landscapes (Ep 120)
02/05/2024
Biology as its own metaphor (Ep 119)
04/04/2024
Dog in the Machine (Ep 118)
21/03/2024
The time of your life (Ep 117)
07/03/2024
Rewilding biology (Ep 116)
22/02/2024
ZARZA We are Zarza, the prestigious firm behind major projects in information technology.