Legal outcomes in immigration cases often depend on the precision and credibility of psychological evaluations. From hardship waivers to asylum and cancellation of removal, courts and immigration officers rely on these evaluations to determine whether someone’s suffering meets the legal threshold for relief—but not all reports are created equal.In this episode, immigration attorney Ginger Jacobs shares what mental health professionals need to know to write evaluations that hold up under scrutiny. She explains how too much narrative detail can backfire, why vague language can trigger requests for evidence, and why collaboration between clinicians and attorneys is more critical than ever.Ready to Make an Impact?If you’re serious about doing immigration evaluations right way—without risking real lives—get the training and mentorship you need. 🎓💡  Use your skills to help level the playing field ⚖️ and make a real difference in people's lives. 🎓 Become an Expert Immigration EvaluatorJoin our Certificate Training Program to gain the skills and confidence needed to conduct effective immigration evaluations.👉 Learn More Here📘 Not Sure Where to Start as an Evaluator?Download our Free Guide to learn the essentials and see if this work is the right fit for you.👉 Get your free guide📲 Follow Us to Grow Your Expertise🔹 Instagram🔹 Facebook🔹 LinkedIn 🌟 Join our private Facebook community for deeper discussions, peer support, and access to valuable training opportunities.👉 Click here to join the group

Ver todos los episodios