#22 Award Criteria Under the Magnifying Glass & Rasmus’ Advice for PhDs

Bestek - de Aanbestedingspodcast
06/09/2022 45 min
#22 Award Criteria Under the Magnifying Glass & Rasmus’ Advice for PhDs

Listen "#22 Award Criteria Under the Magnifying Glass & Rasmus’ Advice for PhDs"

Descargar episodio Ver en sitio original

Episode Synopsis

In this episode, Marta, Willem, and their guest, dr. Rasmus Horskjær Nielsen discuss award criteria and evaluation methods in public procurements. In doing so, Rasmus explains the difference between relevant and controllable competition concepts. In addition, they debate whether there is such a thing as objective criteria For the dessert, you can hear what Rasmus would do differently if he did his PhD again. 

More episodes of the podcast Bestek - de Aanbestedingspodcast

#42 The Irado Case and the Activities Criterion & Fostering a Classroom Community 23/10/2025
#47 De rechtsgevolgen van Didam 11/06/2025
#41 Sustainability Clauses in Public Contracting & Advice for First-Year PhD Students 17/04/2025
#46 De gemeente Amsterdam en de toekomst van aanbestedingen 02/04/2025
#40 Reform of Public Procurement Directives & New Ways of Examining 27/03/2025
#45 Duurzaam aanbestedingsrecht: Herijken van de interne markt voor overheidsopdrachten 04/02/2025
#39 Circularity and Procurement & Procurement Awards 23/01/2025
#38 When Contracts Collide Public Procurement and Contract Law Context & Pop Culture 10/12/2024
#37 Societal Challenges and Interdisciplinary Work in Public Procurement & Teaching the Interdisciplinary Aspects to Students 14/11/2024
#36 New Exclusion Grounds in EU Public Procurement and Reading Recommendations 11/10/2024
© 2003-2025 ZARZA | AHEAD OF OUR TIME
privacy policy
In God we trust In God we trust
PreSales Questions? Click Here
or call our toll-free line at +1-888-5002068 Miami, Florida, USA