Listen "Ep. 144 Direct Aspiration vs Co-Aspiration for Ischemic Stroke with Dr. Baxter and Dr. Tateshima"
Episode Synopsis
Dr. Sabeen Dhand talks with Dr. Blaise Baxter and Dr. Satoshi Tateshima about direct aspiration vs. co-aspiration technique when treating ischemic stroke. In this first episode of a multi-part series covering treatment of ischemic stroke they discuss radial vs. femoral approach, anatomic considerations, and tips and tricks with both techniques.
---
SHOW NOTES
In this episode, neurointerventional specialists Drs. Blaise Baxter, Satoshi Tateshima, and Sabeen Dhand discuss anatomical considerations and procedural techniques in direct aspiration and co-aspiration for ischemic stroke treatment.
The episode starts with a discussion about radial versus femoral approaches. While femoral access remains the most common method, device innovations are making brachial and radial access more available. Dr. Baxter and Dr. Tateshima describe the use of co-aspiration in their frontline techniques. However, Dr. Tateshima notes that he prefers to use direct aspiration in posterior circulation, since the vessel size may be unknown. Dr. Baxter also emphasizes that with co-aspiration, it is important to size-match the catheter with the vessel.
The choice of direct aspiration vs. co-aspiration depends largely on the location of the clot. The doctors walk through different considerations for M1, M2, and M3 strokes. Additionally, they talk about studies that compare the aspiration techniques and outcome factors such as improvements in TICI and mRS scores. Finally, they speak about the rewarding nature of stroke interventions and exciting new developments in the field.
---
RESOURCES
ASTER Randomized Clinical Trial: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28763550/
SAVE vs. ADAPT for Acute Stroke: https://bmcneurol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12883-019-1291-9
---
SHOW NOTES
In this episode, neurointerventional specialists Drs. Blaise Baxter, Satoshi Tateshima, and Sabeen Dhand discuss anatomical considerations and procedural techniques in direct aspiration and co-aspiration for ischemic stroke treatment.
The episode starts with a discussion about radial versus femoral approaches. While femoral access remains the most common method, device innovations are making brachial and radial access more available. Dr. Baxter and Dr. Tateshima describe the use of co-aspiration in their frontline techniques. However, Dr. Tateshima notes that he prefers to use direct aspiration in posterior circulation, since the vessel size may be unknown. Dr. Baxter also emphasizes that with co-aspiration, it is important to size-match the catheter with the vessel.
The choice of direct aspiration vs. co-aspiration depends largely on the location of the clot. The doctors walk through different considerations for M1, M2, and M3 strokes. Additionally, they talk about studies that compare the aspiration techniques and outcome factors such as improvements in TICI and mRS scores. Finally, they speak about the rewarding nature of stroke interventions and exciting new developments in the field.
---
RESOURCES
ASTER Randomized Clinical Trial: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28763550/
SAVE vs. ADAPT for Acute Stroke: https://bmcneurol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12883-019-1291-9
More episodes of the podcast BackTable Vascular & Interventional
Ep. 605 Advanced Surgical Approaches in Lung Cancer Management with Dr. Scott Atay and Dr. Scott Oh
09/01/2026
Ep. 604 Mythbusters: Provocative Mesenteric Angiography for GI Bleeds with Dr. Sabeen Dhand
06/01/2026
Ep. 602 Managing Neuroendocrine Tumors in Interventional Radiology with Dr. Daniel DePietro
30/12/2025
ZARZA We are Zarza, the prestigious firm behind major projects in information technology.