A comparative study of source-finding techniques in HI emission line cubes using SoFiA, MTObjects, and supervised deep learning

23/11/2022 1 min
A comparative study of source-finding techniques in HI emission line cubes using SoFiA, MTObjects, and supervised deep learning

Listen "A comparative study of source-finding techniques in HI emission line cubes using SoFiA, MTObjects, and supervised deep learning"

Episode Synopsis

A comparative study of source-finding techniques in HI emission line cubes using SoFiA, MTObjects, and supervised deep learning by J. A. Barkai et al. on Wednesday 23 November
The 21 cm spectral line emission of atomic neutral hydrogen (HI) is one of
the primary wavelengths observed in radio astronomy. However, the signal is
intrinsically faint and the HI content of galaxies depends on the cosmic
environment, requiring large survey volumes and survey depth to investigate the
HI Universe. As the amount of data coming from these surveys continues to
increase with technological improvements, so does the need for automatic
techniques for identifying and characterising HI sources while considering the
tradeoff between completeness and purity. This study aimed to find the optimal
pipeline for finding and masking the most sources with the best mask quality
and the fewest artefacts in 3D neutral hydrogen cubes. Various existing methods
were explored in an attempt to create a pipeline to optimally identify and mask
the sources in 3D neutral hydrogen 21 cm spectral line data cubes. Two
traditional source-finding methods were tested, SoFiA and MTObjects, as well as
a new supervised deep learning approach, in which a 3D convolutional neural
network architecture, known as V-Net was used. These three source-finding
methods were further improved by adding a classical machine learning classifier
as a post-processing step to remove false positive detections. The pipelines
were tested on HI data cubes from the Westerbork Synthesis Radio Telescope with
additional inserted mock galaxies. SoFiA combined with a random forest
classifier provided the best results, with the V-Net-random forest combination
a close second. We suspect this is due to the fact that there are many more
mock sources in the training set than real sources. There is, therefore, room
to improve the quality of the V-Net network with better-labelled data such that
it can potentially outperform SoFiA.
arXiv: http://arxiv.org/abs/http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.12809v1

More episodes of the podcast Astro arXiv | all categories