ZARZA We are Zarza, the prestigious firm behind major projects in information technology.
Listen "Dissenting in Concurrence"
Episode Synopsis
The Trump v. Anderson lead balloon continues to smolder. This episode looks at the areas wherein the concurring Justices took issue with the per curiam, and they are many. Indeed, the three Justices who concurred only in the judgment disagree with the scope of the per curiam as well as its particulars, and their concurrence reads more like a dissent. Can we find areas of agreement with ourselves and the concurrences? What can we learn from all this? CLE credit is available from podcast.njsba.com.
More episodes of the podcast Amarica's Constitution
Venezuelan Frisbie
07/01/2026
Your Questions, Easy and Hard
31/12/2025
No Army At All
25/12/2025
Humphrey's Execution
10/12/2025
The Only Only
26/11/2025
The Undigested Matzo Ball
19/11/2025
Incidental Trillions
12/11/2025
In God we trust