This a conversation about an academic text that examines the concept of deep disagreement, a situation where participants in an argument lack the foundational, shared assumptions necessary for productive exchange. It focuses specifically on the Dark Enlightenment and the alt-right movement as an example of deep disagreement, highlighting their use of the "red pill" metaphor to suggest that their opponents, aligned with institutions they call the "Cathedral," are trapped in a profound illusion, making conventional argument impossible. The author analyzes this rhetoric and proposes that despite the perceived depth of the divide and the self-sealing nature of such viewpoints, avenues for critical dialogue and argument still exist, particularly by questioning the proposed alternatives and highlighting the shared concepts required for any meaningful disagreement. Ultimately, the text argues for a form of theoretical optimism, suggesting that even very deep disagreements are rarely absolute and that the possibility of argument remains.

Ver todos los episodios