#18-Critical Thinking About Moral Issues

Thinking Clearly
08/12/2017 57 min Episodio 18
#18-Critical Thinking About Moral Issues

Listen "#18-Critical Thinking About Moral Issues"

Descargar episodio Ver en sitio original

Episode Synopsis

Bob and Julia discuss the "is"/"ought" distinction and the process of recognizing and analyzing arguments that contain moral considerations, using passage of California SB 277 as an example.

More episodes of the podcast Thinking Clearly

#112-Bob and Julia Unleashed 25/11/2025
#111-AI-Assisted Tools in Education and How AI Might Assist our Critical Thinking-with guest Kyle Falbo 28/10/2025
#110-The Role of Emotions in Thinking and Learning-with guest Mary Helen Immordino-Yang 23/09/2025
#109-The Moves that Matter in Crafting Persuasive Arguments and Communicating them Effectively-with guests Gerald Graff and Cathy Birkenstein-Graff 26/08/2025
#108-Teaching Critical Thinking to Kids-with guest Stephanie Simoes 22/07/2025
#107-How Institutionalizing Deliberative Political Processes Can Lead to Deliberative Democracy and Reduce Polarization-with guest Jim Fishkin 24/06/2025
#106- The Role of Logic in Acquiring Knowledge and Forming Beliefs-with guest Patrick Hurley 26/05/2025
#105-The Epidemic of Political Lying and the Importance of Fact-checking-with guest Bill Adair 22/04/2025
#104-The Importance of Trust in Information and Institutions-revisited 25/03/2025
#103-Worldview-The Elephant in the Room of Critical Thinking-updated for 2025 25/02/2025
© 2003-2026 ZARZA | AHEAD OF OUR TIME
privacy policy
In God we trust In God we trust
PreSales Questions? Click Here
or call our toll-free line at +1-888-5002068 Miami, Florida, USA