Listen "West Virginia v. EPA"
Episode Synopsis
The Trump administration repealed the 2015 Clean Power Plan, which established guidelines for states to limit carbon dioxide emissions from power plants, and issued in its place the Affordable Clean Energy (ACE) Rule, which eliminated or deferred the guidelines. However, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit vacated the ACE Rule as arbitrary and capricious. One of the challengers, North American Coal Corporation, challenged the Environmental Protection Agency’s authority to so broadly regulate greenhouse gas emissions.
The case was decided on June 30, 2022. The Court held that this case remains justiciable notwithstanding the Government’s contention that no petitioner has Article 3 standing, given EPA’s stated intention not to enforce the Clean Power Plan and to instead engage in new rulemaking. The Court also held that Congress did not grant EPA in Section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act the authority to devise emissions caps based on the generation shifting approach the Agency took in the Clean Power Plan. Chief Justice ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Justices THOMAS, ALITO, GORSUCH, KAVANAUGH, and BARRETT joined. Justice GORSUCH filed a concurring opinion, in which Justice ALITO joined. Justice KAGAN filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justices BREYER and SOTOMAYOR joined.
Credit: Oyez, LII Supreme Court Resources, Justia Supreme Court Center, available at: https://www.oyez.org/cases/2021/20-1530.
The case was decided on June 30, 2022. The Court held that this case remains justiciable notwithstanding the Government’s contention that no petitioner has Article 3 standing, given EPA’s stated intention not to enforce the Clean Power Plan and to instead engage in new rulemaking. The Court also held that Congress did not grant EPA in Section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act the authority to devise emissions caps based on the generation shifting approach the Agency took in the Clean Power Plan. Chief Justice ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Justices THOMAS, ALITO, GORSUCH, KAVANAUGH, and BARRETT joined. Justice GORSUCH filed a concurring opinion, in which Justice ALITO joined. Justice KAGAN filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justices BREYER and SOTOMAYOR joined.
Credit: Oyez, LII Supreme Court Resources, Justia Supreme Court Center, available at: https://www.oyez.org/cases/2021/20-1530.
More episodes of the podcast Supreme Court Opinions
Pitts v. Mississippi
04/12/2025
Clark v. Sweeney
04/12/2025
Goldey v. Fields
04/12/2025
Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Paxton
31/07/2025
Trump v. CASA, Inc.
24/07/2025
FCC v. Consumers' Research
23/07/2025
Mahmoud v. Taylor
21/07/2025
Kennedy v. Braidwood Management, Inc.
18/07/2025
Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic
16/07/2025
Hewitt v. United States
14/07/2025
ZARZA We are Zarza, the prestigious firm behind major projects in information technology.