#354: Problems with the Meta-Analysis in Nutrition

Sigma Nutrition Radio
29/09/2020 1h 12min
#354: Problems with the Meta-Analysis in Nutrition

Listen "#354: Problems with the Meta-Analysis in Nutrition"

Descargar episodio Ver en sitio original

Episode Synopsis

Danny & Alan discuss issues with using and interpreting meta-analyses in nutritional science, they answer a question about methods of reheating food, and they highlight a recent paper published by quacks that experts have termed a "deception". Today's Topic in Focus [08:50] "I Have a Question!" [53:35] Quack Asylum [59:32] Something Random [66:42] Show notes: https://sigmanutrition.com/episode354

More episodes of the podcast Sigma Nutrition Radio

#589: Causal Inference in Nutrition Science – Daniel Ibsen, PhD 30/12/2025
#588: Menstrual Cycle "Syncing": Do the Claims Hold Up to Evidence? – Expert Panel 23/12/2025
#587: How Should Nutrition Be Taught in Medical Training? – Akash Patel 16/12/2025
#586: The Manufactured Collapse of Expertise 09/12/2025
SNP46: Reviewing Six Key Insights from the Year's Conversations 02/12/2025
#585: Why We Think Poorly: Reason, Emotion, and Evidence-Based Reasoning 25/11/2025
#584: EAT-Lancet: Does the Planetary Health Diet Improve Human Health? 18/11/2025
#583: Ultra-Processed Foods & Fixing the Food Environment – Kevin Hall, PhD 11/11/2025
SNP45: Antioxidants – What You Need To Know 04/11/2025
#582: GLP-1 Agonists: Side Effects, Management and Diet – Dr. Spencer Nadolsky 28/10/2025
© 2003-2026 ZARZA | AHEAD OF OUR TIME
privacy policy
In God we trust In God we trust
PreSales Questions? Click Here
or call our toll-free line at +1-888-5002068 Miami, Florida, USA